Back to Roulette
Roulette535

casino says covering 24 numbers with bonus is low risk play, but it still loses plenty.

Casinos like to hype up "covering 24 numbers" in roulette, throwing in a bonus for a couple of straight-up numbers, acting like it’s a safe move. I’ve tried this setup quite a few times and yeah, you win something a good amount, but over a long session it gets chipped away pretty fast. One or two dry spins and all those chips are gone. Feels more like steady slow leaks than low risk.

Anyone else run the numbers on this or tracked their actual long-term results? I’m curious if the house edge changes much at all with these “low risk” combos.

1
536Save

Discussion — 5 comments

Sort
5 comments
S
1,139•

I fell for that kind of wording before, same as slots saying “more hit frequency” like that means safer. It just means you stay busy losing smaller chunks, and yeah I didn’t track every spin but my bankroll sure did 😑

1
F
172•

Yeah, "low risk" with 13 numbers still blanking you is casino copy, not math. If this was european roulette, what 24 did you even cover exactly, and were the bonus straight-ups replacing a corner bet or just bloating the same leak?

1
M
625•

Yeah, that's the part people miss. More numbers covered doesn't automatically mean lower house edge. The zero is still sitting there waiting to ruin the spreadsheet.

0
D
600•

Yeah lol I tracked it once on speed roulette, just turned my losses into drizzle.

0
T
1,389•

Yeah, tracked it. Same house edge, just dressed up prettier by the dealer, imo.

0

You reached the end