Back to Poker

why some poker games have crazy spread limits nobody wants

I’ve noticed in a few poker rooms lately they’re spreading these bizarre $1-$100 or $2-$200 limit games. Not like no limit or a proper fixed limit, just wide open spreads that make almost zero sense for table dynamics. It’s always empty or gets some crusty regulars bumhunting short stacks. The vibe gets weird since half the table tries to limp in cheap, then you have someone jamming max the second they hit top pair. It just never seems to flow like normal action, and honestly, most people don’t look like they're having a good time.

Is there some logic for casinos even running these weird limit structures? Does anybody actually prefer these spread limits over something more consistent, or is it just a failed experiment? I always thought consistent betting made the game better for both regulars and people just getting started. What am I missing here, or is it as pointless as it seems?

-1
793Save

Discussion — 7 comments

Sort
7 comments
K
2992 replies

Yeah it’s mostly casino filler lol, same energy as crypto casinos making weird formats nobody asked for

2
N
481

"filler" is dead on. Slots filler prints, spread poker just sulks lol

3
G
1,002

Spread-limit poker just lets the room post a game on paper and rake every limped pot. Saw a $1-$300 table die in 40 minutes, same nonsense!!!

1
Z
8,107

Yeah i tried one once, thought maybe i was missing it lol. Nah, spread limit just plays dumb, same energy as bad slots

1
M
767

Nah, the logic is usually legal workaround crap, not player demand. Some rooms can't spread true no-limit, so they slap on a goofy cap and call it a game yesss, same energy as promo bait.

1
O
771

Yeah it's a rake trap dressed up as choice. What room was this, and was the cap tied to blind size or just made up?

0
L
1,139

its dumb. same reason bad blackjack tables exist, house fills seats

0

You reached the end