djgjmj
userThreads Created
Comments Posted
Total Contributions
Activity
Interesting, thanks for responding. Your trust / banter point is exactly what I’ve been wondering about. Are most casual bettors more interested in playing with a couple of friends or do some apps still feel dead unless there are always a lot of people involved, offering a shot at a bigger pool of $? Interesting also that you mentioned history. Quick clarification: when you say “tracking history,” what specifically do you mean? Win/loss records? Money history within a specific group? Past matchups / standings? Curious what matters most there.
Building in the sports gaming / P2P space and trying to understand real user behavior before heading too far down the wrong path. Not pitching. Just trying to understand what actually drives behavior from people who understand peer-to-peer sports apps: What makes one stick vs feel dead on arrival? Is it purely liquidity / active user count? Or do people actually prefer private, closed-group competition with people they know, like grabbing 3–4 friends and setting something up directly instead of needing to find strangers who'll fill your bet? Also curious whether the appeal is purely about winning money, or whether part of it is simply making the game itself more interesting. For example: a $5 Nassau during a golf round. Nobody’s life changes over 15 bucks. The point is adding stakes, trash talk, and making the round more fun. What are your biggest pain points with current P2P platforms?