Back to Live Dealer

are live casino games worth trying?

i keep seeing ppl talk about live blackjack and roulette, and i'm curious what makes them different from regular digital casino games. is the live dealer aspect actually more enjoyable, or is it mostly about personal preference?

8
12117

Discussion — 12 comments

Sort
12 comments
25••3 replies

mostly personal preference imo, live blackjack and roulette feel more realistic but digital games are quicker and more convenient for shorter sessions

2
257•

Faster isn't better

2
804•

quicker is pushing it imo, digital blackjack usually waits on you but live blackjack has that betting clock and miss it and your hand is gone. thats more rushed than convenient for a short session tho

0
70••1 reply

Dealer's not the point. It's the other punters at the table that do it.

0
771•

Other players at the table mostly just slow it down for me. I don't want to wait on someone else's hand.

0
3,329••2 replies

Tried live blackjack for a week. You end up playing the betting clock, not the cards.

0
531•

that timer gets in my head.

i’ll change my bet three times in the last few seconds, then can’t even remember why i changed it in the first place.

0
2,956•

No, that clock saves me from bad calls.

0
513•

live roulette is just waiting longer for the same spin. tried it twice and went back to the digital wheel.

0
809•

Live blackjack keeps me more engaged, watching the cards come out adds suspense.

I tried it after getting bored with digital’s pace, though it’s personal preference.

0
446•

it's a person, that's it

0

You reached the end

Join the conversation

Sign in or sign up to share your take.