Back to Poker
Poker390

Poker position importance: why do some players ignore it completely?

I see this all the time at lower stakes and in home games - some folks just straight up ignore position at the poker table. Like, they’ll limp in with weak hands from under the gun or call off half their stack in early position like it’s no big deal. It’s wild to me because so much advice out there hammers on about position being one of the biggest factors in poker, but a chunk of the table just doesn’t care. Are they just bored? Do they not notice the difference between acting first and acting last? Or maybe they really don’t believe position makes a big enough impact?

I get that live casino games can feel a bit more casual and sometimes folks just want to play, not sit and fold. Still, feels like a leak that could be fixed pretty easily with a bit of intentional thinking. For those who actually ignore position - why do you think it doesn’t matter in your game?

1
732Save

Discussion — 7 comments

Sort
7 comments
D
1,216••3 replies

I spent a month in low-stakes home games tracking how often position played out and honestly, most players just want action. It reminds me of people skipping bonus terms at online casinos just to chase spins. The slower payout when you're out of position feels less urgent if your main goal is fun, not grinding edge. At a full ring, missing that advantage can sneak up on you though. Ever see anyone win consistently in these games by flat ignoring position?

2
M
926•

Lately I wonder if the real thing is impatience. At online casinos, chasing roulette numbers without caring about bet size or timing is kind of the same vibe. Most folks crave the hit, not the best odds. Does your crew ever talk about hands after, or is it all just on to the next deal?

0
T
405••1 reply

Action seekers rarely track how being first to move means revealing their intentions cheapest, but I’ve noticed in crypto casinos, folks act the same way with slots - blasting spins, thinking each click is independent, when bankroll risk stacks up. Poker position is invisible until that one ugly hand wipes out a night, and by then, most are chalking it up to a “bad beat” instead of a strategy leak. Maybe it’s not just about not caring, it’s the psychology of loss - quick losses feel like variance, but slow leaks from ignoring position blend into the background. Ever try showing your crew even a simple session replay with positions highlighted? The “aha” only seems to click when they see it in their own play history.

0
J
548•

watching my blackjack buddies double down blind without counting their cards kind of mirrors this, honestly. quick hits feel more exciting than careful edge hunting. small leaks add up but chasing that rush always seems to override slow, methodical play.

0
A
664•

Curiosity gets the better of most casual players, so they pay to see flops from anywhere on the table. It’s like spotting a value bet and wanting instant results, even if the odds are stacked the other way.

3
T
4,441•

Had a buddy who only took poker position seriously after losing a buy-in during a free bonus promo. Ignoring edges feels cheap until your promo play fizzles and you realize why. Ever notice how those promo chasers rarely talk about the actual hand, just the size of their loss?

1
B
876•

a while back, i used to treat roulette the same way, thinking every spin was its own shot at glory and not sweating the little edges or bad bets stacking up. realized later those tiny leaks mattered more than i wanted to admit, especially after a rough stretch where i kept buying back in without really knowing why i was losing. for poker, position is just another one of those slow-leak spots. folks ignore it because in the moment, the itch to play beats the plan. it took tracking losses before i cared about plugging those gaps. most don’t notice until the leaks drain their stack.

0

You reached the end