I play MTTs online with about a $300 to $500 roll, usually buying in for $5 to $22. Trying to stick with one site more, rather than bouncing around. I’ve been comparing PokerStars and GGPoker, mainly looking at the tournament schedule and how the rakeback and promos add up over a month. Do they have much difference in the fields and structures at these stakes, or does it come down to which promos you get? Thanks in advance.
formats and field sizes vary more by event than by site, so just compare the schedules you’d actually play. promos help, but rakeback counts for less if the buy-ins and structures don’t suit you.
ended up playing more on pokerstars since the lobby was easier to follow and i could find tournaments i liked without much digging. the promo difference mattered less to me than having games i wanted to play, rakeback only goes so far if the lobby feels like a chore
You reached the end
Join the conversation
Sign in or sign up to share your take.
Neither looks clearly better across the board to me. The fields and late-reg lengths can change a lot from one event to the next, even at $5-$22. Worth checking the specific tournaments you play before reading too much into a site's overall reputation.