anyone notice roulette variance feels different between games per hour
so i usually appreciate anyone who actually logs their sessions, because most folks just go by feel, but lately i've been trying to track roulette variance by number of spins per hour. feels like when i'm playing a faster live dealer or even on auto roulette, the swings hit harder than when it drags slower at a real table. obviously, the game is the same odds-wise, but the win/loss patterns seem to go off the rails faster when the spins pile up, especially with outside bets.
maybe it’s just sample size or i’m noticing patterns where there aren’t any, but curious if anyone else feels like their bankroll gets chewed up way faster in games with more spins per hour. is the variance actually noticable or am i just fooling myself here?
faster spins just crank variance exposure way up, even though the house edge is fixed. on neon roulette, my outside bets felt safe until i saw bankroll drops spiral way quicker than on a slow casino night. it's not that variance is higher per spin, just that you get punched by it more times per hour, so the pain stacks faster. do you log net win per 100 spins or just by total session length? feels like that unit matters a ton for how brutal it feels.
You reached the end