Back to Sports Betting

does only betting soft lines get you limited faster

so i’ve been tiptoeing around sharper lines for a while, just because i hate getting limited or forced onto lower stake stuff, but it’s hard to resist when the soft lines just pop up right there. the thing is, i keep hearing from a couple people that if you only touch those soft lines, especially live or early openers, the books will tag you way faster than if you blend in a bunch of action on sharper stuff or even the fun longshots.

i don’t really care much about parlays or random action, but do you actually get flagged way quicker if your betting is like all soft openers and nothing else? or does the mix really matter that much in the end? anyone ever try disguising their action and did it actually help with limits?

0
442Save

Discussion — 4 comments

Sort
4 comments
A
1,0142 replies

Yeah lol I tried the “mix in junk action” thing for like a month to protect a little poker roll and it felt fake as hell, bookmaker still clocked the only thing that mattered, when I was hitting stale numbers early. I might be wrong on “faster” but disguising it did basically nothing for me lmao

0
M
792

books arent blind lol if ur only winning on soft openers in niche markets thats the whole file rn, the random longshot tax never fooled anybody !!!

0
W
818

Bonuses are the fakest camouflage anyway, books can smell a soft opener hit through a mile of promo fluff. Maybe not faster, but they still clock the ONLY thing that pays.

0
D
489

"tiptoeing around" got me. I did that with Blackjack once and got limited just the SAME.

0

You reached the end