Back to Crypto Casinos

gamdom vip cashback counted casino play but not originals.

so it totally makes sense that they want to reward regular casino play for vip cashback. the house edge is higher, player risk goes up, everybody wins except the unlucky guy at the tables. i'm not blind to how this is attractive for their vip model. more rtp variance, more house revenue, bigger slice for loyalty cashbacks.

but why are the originals like their in-house games not counting towards it? you’d think those games drive just as much action, if not more, from us grinders. is it just because the edge is lower or is there something deeper? the games are instant, so less time and maybe less rake overall? or is it something to do with crypto volatility and how fast coins move between games? i’m split here. half of me gets that promos have to have cutoffs somewhere. the other half feels like i’m getting the short end for being efficient. i run a lot of numbers on the side and originals are pretty transparent on the odds. sort of feels like i’m getting quietly punished for knowing the math.

0
557Save

Discussion — 5 comments

Sort
5 comments
J
567

Blackjack counts?

1
Z
3,452

Sports too?

1
B
703

"efficient" lol yeah that's the part!!!

0
S
397

Yep, originals are too clean on the math. Live dealer bleeds better...

0
B
1,095

It’s not about “fair,” it’s about what’s easy to comp without getting picked apart. Originals are the first thing decent grinders hammer because the rounds are fast, the math is clean, and you can cycle stupid volume before the promo team even wakes up. Live Dealer is different, slower hands, provider costs, seat limit on some tables, more friction, more people punting instead of farming. That’s the part people miss. Same wager amount does not mean same promo exposure. House edge matters some, sure, but comp risk matters more, and originals are where they get nickeled to death by people who actually know what they’re doing.

0

You reached the end