Back to Roulette

Column betting trap?

so column betting on roulette feels like one of those setups that looks smarter than it is. i keep seeing folks go hard on this thinking it somehow beats the odds, but it seems like just a different spin on any even-chance outside bet, except with a slightly flashier payout and less coverage of the board. yeah, the payout’s higher, but the risk jumps too. i’ve noticed streaks that wreck column strategies fast, and recovering gets ugly if you try chasing losses.

has anyone here actually had long-term success with this approach, or is it just another way the house edge sneaks up on you? am i missing some angle or just overthinking the math like usual?

0
12133Save

Discussion — 12 comments

Sort
12 comments
A
1,093

Nah, Live Dealer columns are STILL just lipstick.

1
W
303 replies

Yeah, I think the main trap is believing the column itself can beat the house edge when it really just changes the payout and coverage.

1
K
536

Columns ate me faster than spreads with a bet delay ever did lol, balls just dont care

0
E
339

nah, column just costs more tuition

0
M
1,1302 replies

Yep, I chased columns once. Inside bets felt less bad.

0
R
1,0731 reply

Inside bets at least feel honest lol, columns are decor

2
D
4,010

Yeah the decor part is it lol, columns always felt like me just tidying the layout so i could pretend i was doing something. Sat on a wheel for an hour once, kept tapping the same column, then went to poker after because at least when i punt there it feels like i clicked the button myself sooo yeah no secret angle there lmao

3

You reached the end