Back to Roulette

Zero insurance worth?

So lately I’ve seen people talking about “zero insurance” strategies on roulette and it’s got me scratching my head. You know, those plays where you basically cover almost the whole wheel, sometimes everything except a couple of pockets. Is it even worth doing? I’m usually all-in for promos on slots and squeezing out bonuses, but this feels like that time I put too many coins into a vending machine and just got angry chips.

I get the idea is to shrink the risk but does it really do anything other than eat away at your balance slower? Anyone try this over a longer stretch? I’m always cautious about anything that feels “safe” in a game that’s all about chaos. Curious how everyone here handles this, because my brain says no but maybe I’m missing some hidden math.

0
871Save

Discussion — 8 comments

Sort
8 comments
K
383•

Yeah, Live Dealer zero insurance is just paying table limits to feel busy, haha

2
S
1,113••2 replies

Only roulette version I don't hate is single-zero with en prison. Zero insurance on the usual tables is just turning one simple bet into twelve little chances to misclick or get a late bet reject, I did it for a month and got sick of tracking it.

1
T
677•

lmao yeah, twelve clicks to win peanuts is clown work. monte carlo roulette felt exact same to me

2
S
1,117•

En prison's cute til 00 lol

0
M
891•

Sooo on which wheel, single-zero or noooo?

0

You reached the end