Back to Blackjack

Insurance trap?

Last session at my regular spot, I kept watching players hammer the insurance bet every time the dealer flipped an Ace. It got me thinking again about the long-term math on that move. I get the appeal in the moment - nobody wants to see their blackjack or big double-up squashed by a dealer’s ten, but all the stats I’ve seen call insurance a classic sucker bet. Unless someone’s been actually counting cards and honestly, nobody at my table was, you’re basically just betting for the dealer to have a blackjack at worse than even odds.

I tried to bring it up with a couple guys after a tough hand and got shrugged off. Maybe there’s something I’m missing, like some angle folks are using these days. Would love to hear what others have experienced when it comes to the insurance side of things. Is anyone actually making it work for them, or does it only seem tempting after a run of bad luck?

-1
25Save

Discussion — 2 comments

Sort
2 comments
F
1,404

"Regular spot" says enough. Live Dealer regulars misread patterns constantly.

1
B
1,491

Honestly yeah, it mostly just feels good after you’ve been punched in the teeth a few hands in a row. That’s the whole thing. Insurance is the same itch as panic-cashing out a sports bet in the 3rd quarter because your stomach gets loud. I’ve done both, and every time it was me buying emotional relief, not value. Once i started treating calm decision-making like an actual SKILL, that bet got way easier to ignore. If you’re not counting, you’re basically paying a little fee to feel less sick for ten seconds. I hate it. Bluntly, i think people “make it work” in the same way lucky socks work.

0

You reached the end