DonRuletto is building a positive reputation through community engagement.
This actually happened to me today, and I recorded it, but in my case it happened on roulette. Because of that error, they only refunded the exact amount I had bet, not the winnings I could have received. It definitely puts you through a very frustrating moment.
Yes, I agree. So far, I’ve been identifying several recurring relationships and patterns. The next step is to define some of them precisely and test them on a new, fixed sample to see whether they actually occur more often than expected or can simply be explained by chance. What caught my attention wasn’t a single isolated combination, but seeing certain relationships repeat under similar conditions across different records. Even so, I agree that this alone isn’t enough: they need to be defined in advance and their frequency measured in a more controlled way.
You’re still focusing on zero as if my point were that it predicts the next spin, and that’s not what I’m saying. I’ve emphasized this several times, so I’m not sure why you’re still interpreting it that way. Zero is only a reference point; the important part is something broader that you still seem to be overlooking: how several conditions and sequences relate to each other and develop across multiple spins.
It may not be a reference point in the way you analyze roulette. In my approach, I do use it as one, because aligning different sequences around the 0 allows me to compare what was happening before, what develops afterward, and how many spins separate certain configurations. I’m not saying that the 0 causes those patterns.
Hello everyone. I wanted to share a different way I’ve been looking at roulette and some relationships I’ve found in my records. I’m not saying that 0 automatically causes something specific to happen. I see it more as a possible reference point within a broader structure. In my records, I don’t only look at what happens immediately after 0. I compare red/black, odd/even, low/high, dozens, and columns, along with the length, accumulation, spacing, and repetition of certain sequences. I’ve noticed that when several characteristics start to build up at the same time, interesting behavior can sometimes appear later in other categories. For example, there may be a sequence of several numbers from 1–18 that are also all black, or one particular dozen may appear repeatedly while those numbers are also red. In other cases, odd or even numbers may begin to dominate together with a certain dozen or another characteristic. To see how several of these elements relate to one another and at what points certain conditions overlap, I compare the different characteristics as a whole. From there, I observe how the roulette results develop, what happens afterward, how many spins pass, and how much distance there is between one sequence and another. Depending on which characteristics are dominating and how they are distributed across the different categories, in some of my records these concentrations have later coincided with streaks, repetitions, new sequences, repeated numbers and, at certain moments, also with the appearance of 0. This has led me to distinguish relatively stable periods from others in which more imbalances, repetitions, and sequences begin to accumulate. That possible change of state is exactly what I’m trying to study: how the results move from a relatively stable period into another one where several characteristics begin to concentrate or appear more frequently. In several of my records, some of these changes occur close to the appearance of 0, sometimes before it and sometimes after it, but not necessarily on the immediately following spin. That is why I don’t consider 0 an automatic trigger, but rather a possible reference point within that process. If I only analyzed a few spins immediately after 0, I would be leaving out a large part of what I’m actually observing. What I’m trying to determine now is whether certain combinations of conditions can identify periods in which particular characteristics tend to appear more frequently within a limited number of spins. My goal is not to predict one specific number, but to define those periods more clearly, observe how the different categories evolve within them, and see whether there are recurring relationships between concentrations, sequences, changes of state, and the appearance of 0. That’s why any observation, suggestion, or even a different interpretation could be useful to me. If anyone is studying something similar, has found complementary relationships, or even results that contradict what I’m seeing, I’d also be interested in hearing about them. I’m not working only from a theoretical idea. I already have a considerable amount of records and observations in which certain behaviors appear repeatedly. What I’m looking for now is to compare them with independent analysis, see how well these relationships hold up, and determine more precisely what real value they may have.
Excellent, that makes a lot of sense. It seems more likely that the delay is caused by a loss of synchronization rather than a software failure. Still, just because a software issue is less likely doesn’t mean it’s impossible. Thanks for the clarification — you can always learn something from exchanging experiences.
Up to 24 in a row. I have screenshots documenting 17 consecutive ones.
A lot of black screens even when the signal is good, and when the ball lands on a number it takes too long for that number to appear on the screen. That suggests there may be software issues, and in some cases a later bet might not be registered or counted properly.
I do believe previous spins can provide useful information, but not necessarily in the classic sense of seeing a streak and expecting it to reverse. In my case, I’m more interested in how different categories and sequences relate to each other, which conditions tend to repeat, and how they develop over several spins. That’s where, at least for me, analyzing the history starts to make more sense.
I understand your point. I’m not saying that zero causes what happens next or that it changes the probability of the next spin. What I’m looking at is something different: whether zero tends to appear at certain points within a sequence, and whether certain structures repeatedly show up around it. Since zero falls outside red/black, odd/even, and high/low, I’m treating it as a different kind of reference point. I already have several records where certain formations repeat before or after zero appears, so I’m interested in seeing whether anyone else has noticed something similar. I’m not claiming it is a rule. I’m comparing the data to see whether that relationship actually holds up.