does mass tabling micro stakes make rooms review your account for bot stuff
I’m curious if anyone here has experienced extra account reviews from poker rooms just for running a bunch of micro tables at once. Like, if you grind 10-12 tables of the smallest stakes, does that get flagged as potential bot activity more than grinding mid-stakes at just a couple tables?
It feels like high table count at micro stakes should be normal - since volume’s the way to beat the rake, right? Still, I’ve been hearing stories about rooms being hypersensitive lately, and I’m doing the usual, quick decisions, little chat, never timing out on purpose. My own style is way more mechanical when I’m on a mass-table grind, so I wonder if that increases the risk. There’s no promotion in play here, I just want to hit the rakeback target for the week.
I know some blackjack sites don’t care as long as you’re not colluding or cheating bonuses, but poker has more eyes on it. Would love to hear how others handle this or if anyone’s been hit with a surprise review for multitabling small stakes.
The bot panic gets a bit overcooked. I’ve been “reviewed” over daft KYC stuff and payment checks that dragged on for ages, not because I was hammering micros quickly. Half these rooms are just clunky and suspicious by habit.
Nah lol, micros + machine-fast clicks DO get eyeballs sometimes, rooms that run slots like ass are usually twitchy everywhere. Were you on one skin all week or hopping tables nonstop?
Hopping tables + reload bonus got me checked fast
Lowkey i think people overrate the click-speed thing lol, half the time it’s the promo plumbing that’s busted, touch a reload/cashback and suddenly some room with manual cashouts and zero ownership transparency wants a “review.” i’d look at bonus tracking before i’d blame 10nl robot fingers, ngl